From Bad To Worse 2019-2020: Swedish Healthcare System Downed

From Bad To Worse 2019-2020: Swedish Healthcare System Downed

Swedish people have never in history paid more taxes – soon they will even be paying tax on their wedding gifts! No, this is not a joke (TAX ON WEDDING GIFTS)! The Social Democrats and Prime Minister Stefan Löfven, has managed to down the entire state. Welfare cut in half, more than 1 million people homeless according to housing cues, people dying in line to medical care, social welfare to only a few while the rest perish and all money to companies and executives.

When this was warned about in 2015, only those on the outer premises, away from safety and a normal life was effected, and few if even any believed in the upcoming fall of the state. Then more and more hospitals was put down, more and more people got less help, and now 1000 of the Stockholm healthcare personnel are being laid off!

The real irony of the situation is that we all know that the money goes to politicians, private investors and consultants instead of salary to nurses and medical physicians, doctors. The Stockholm Helathcare say’s they’ve now had enough and will march through Stockholm this Saturday, December 14, 2019.

They are saying that Swedish healthcare are long overdue for overhaul and repair, and instead of repairing, the Government are dismantling the entire healthcare system. We are in chock! This affects the entire population of Sweden and we want a stop to the experiments being practiced on us in the Stockholm region!

Link to there facebook page https://www.facebook.com/events/486303872001097/

Nu har vi i Stockholms vård fått nog.

Storvarsel och omorganisationer blev droppen som fick bägaren att rinna över. Facebook-gruppen Stockholms sjukvårdsupprop består av sjukvårdspersonal och den 14:e december marscherar vi genom stan tillsammans med patienter och medborgare för att visa vårt missnöje över de beslut, varsel och organisationsförändringar som kommer skapa patientosäkerhet, förlänga vårdköerna och i slutändan drabba inte bara våra sjukaste och sköraste patienter, utan hela befolkningen.

Vården behöver rustas upp, inte ner. Varslen måste dras tillbaka med omedelbar verkan. En omställning till vård närmare befolkningen kan omöjligen framtvingas genom neddragningar på sjukhusen. Till att börja med måste det ske genom investeringar i vårdcentralerna. Vi vill se ett slut på experimentverkstaden i Stockholms sjukvård. Som vårdpersonal vet vi mest om hur sjukvården bör organiseras, men vi behöver resurser att göra det och inflytande över hur det ska gå till. Patientsäkerheten är visst hotad!

Alla är välkomna att gå med i detta fredliga tåg.

Ta gärna med plakat, men vi vill inte ha några partipolitiska symboler och inte heller några personangrepp.

Klockan 12:00 samlas vi på Mynttorget och lyssnar på några talare. Ca 12:50 går vi från Mynttorget, via Riddarhuset, Vasabron, Tegelbacken, Stadshuset, Hantverkargatan fram till Landstingshuset, där manifestationen avslutas med ytterligare tal.”

Translation Google:

“Now in Stockholm we have had enough.

Mass Notice, and reorganization became the drop that made the beaker run over. The Facebook group Stockholm Healthcare Call consists of healthcare professionals and on December 14 we march through town with patients and citizens to show our dissatisfaction with the decisions, notice and organizational changes that will create patient insecurity, extend the care queues and ultimately not only affect our sickest and craziest patients, without the entire population.

The care needs to be equipped, not down. The notifications must be withdrawn with immediate effect. A change of care to the population closer to the population can probably not be forced through hospital reductions. For starters, this must be done through investments in health centers. We want to see an end to the experimental workshop in Stockholm’s healthcare. As healthcare professionals, we know most about how healthcare should be organized, but we need resources to do so and influence how it should go. Patient safety is certainly threatened!

Everyone is welcome to join this peaceful train.

Feel free to include posters, but we do not want any party political symbols and no personal attacks.

At 12:00 we gather at Mynttorget and listen to some speakers. About 12:50 we go from Mynttorget, via Riddarhuset, Vasabron, Tegelbacken, Stadshuset, Hantverkargatan to Landstingshuset, where the manifestation ends with further speeches. “

When is Winter 2019 & 2020? Dates of Winter

When is Winter 2019 & 2020? Dates of Winter

In the Northern Hemisphere autumn ends and winter starts at the moment of the December solstice, which occurs every year between December twenty and December twenty-three winter ends and spring starts at the moment of the march equinox, which occurs every year between March nineteen and March twenty-one In the Southern Hemisphere winter lasts from the June solstice (June 20 to 22) to the September equinox (September 21 to 23). Meteorological winter Meteorologists, on the other hand, define seasons based on climatic conditions and the annual temperature cycle.

While the exact definition of a season’s timing and length can differ in different areas based on local conditions, in most of the Northern Hemisphere meteorological winter is generally defined as the three months of December, January and February, with the season starting on December 1 and ending on February 28 (29 in a leap year).

Astronomical and meteorological winter start and end on different dates. Astronomical winter IN the astronomical calendar the start and end dates of winter are based on the changing position of Earth in relation to the sun, and the resulting solar events of equinoxes and solstices.

In the Northern Hemisphere, autumn ends and winter starts at the moment of the December solstice, which occurs every year between December twenty and December twenty-three winter ends and spring starts at the moment of the march equinox, which occurs every year between March nineteen and March twenty-one In the Southern Hemisphere winter lasts from the June solstice (June 20 to 22) to the September equinox (September 21 to 23).

The start and end dates for winter given on this page are the dates of astronomical winter in the Northern Hemisphere and are based on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), which for practical purposes is equivalent to Greenwich Mean Time (GMT). While winter starts and ends at the same moment in time all over the Northern Hemisphere, the date and local time differ from place to place depending on the year and a location’s time zone.

For locations that are ahead of UTC (further east) it may fall on the day after, and for locations that are behind UTC (further west) it may fall on the day before. To find out the exact date and time of winter 2019 in your area use this seasons calculator. meteorological winter Meteorologists, on the other hand, define seasons based on climatic conditions and the annual temperature cycle.

IT is important for them to be able to compare the same period of time in different years. The length of the astronomical seasons varies between eighty-nine and ninety-three days, while the length of the meteorological seasons is less variable and is fixed at ninety days for winter in a non-leap year (91 days in a leap year), ninety-two days for spring and summer, and 91 days for autumn.

While the exact definition of a season’s timing and length can differ in different areas based on local conditions, in most of the Northern Hemisphere meteorological winter is generally defined as the three months of December, January and February, with the season starting on December 1 and ending on February 28 (29 in a leap year). There is no “official rule” which definition of winter to use, and different countries adhere to different conventions. Most of due_North America and Europe use astronomical winter, while Australia and New Zealand use meteorological winter (however, as these countries are in the Southern Hemisphere, the seasons are opposed and winter there lasts from June to August). In other cultures, e.g.

My Perazzi High Tech DRadulovich

My Perazzi High Tech DRadulovich

Shooting my normal shells with everything the exact same other than the receiver, it truly had about 30% less recoil — I know it wasn’t a placebo effect because I was determined to prove there was no difference between the two guns. I was honestly shocked, I kept changing back and forth between receivers and couldn’t find any negative characteristics of the HT. So there are some things that I am going to be able to notice while shooting it that many other shooters will not be able to, but that’s because it’s my job to know and understand that stuff — just as you would trust your doctor with his medical background.

Now, just because you might not be able to “feel” these characteristics, it doesn’t mean that they aren’t there. Since this is the case, regardless of whether or not you know what to feel, it’s going to influence the way you shoot and score — dramatically. at this point you’re probably asking yourself, “What in the world is Radulovich talking about?” — let me explain.

This article is not going to be a “review” of the new Perazzi High Tech. What I want to do, is explain why the High tech truly is the best gun available for competitive shooting, but I want to do so from a perspective that you never get to hear. I don’t want to talk about the materials used to make the gun (even though they are the best), or anything else along those lines. What I want to talk about is exactly why this gun allows me to shoot better than I would be able to with any other gun — from the perspective of my own shooting, as someone who competes at the highest level possible in the shooting sports.

For your convenience, and because this post is going to be fairly long with the included pictures, I have formatted each aspect of this article into the below sections. each section is in an “accordion” so that whatever it is you would like to read, you can just click on it and it will appear. Descriptions of each section are in italics below each accordion: Response to dubiousness on SGW Great questions! I’m glad you asked! I love the High Tech, much more so than the MX2000/S I used to shoot.

When the High tech first came out, I honestly thought it was all just marketing — how can that added weight really reduce recoil that much? I was very hesitant to switch, and flat out denied Perazzi’s requests for a year to switch guns to help market the new HT. About a year after the HT was released, I had a student of mine at the Nationals come into the booth to try some demo guns because he was going to order a Perazzi — we took the HT out onto the practice course and while we were out there, I put my barrels/stock/forend on the HT receiver and honestly couldn’t believe the difference.

Shooting my normal shells with everything the exact same other than the receiver, it truly had about 30% less recoil — I know it wasn’t a placebo effect because I was determined to prove there was no difference between the two guns. I was honestly shocked, I kept changing back and forth between receivers and couldn’t find any negative characteristics of the HT. IT had less recoil, slightly better movement, and balanced slightly better. When we came off the course, both my student and I started putting together orders for a new HT.

IT took me another couple of months to complete my order though — there were a few things I wanted to play around with in terms of how to build the gun, and I took the opportunity of switching guns as the time to go ahead with some of my new ideas, being that I plan on shooting this gun for the rest of my career. Now, a couple of things to note here: 1) I am very attuned to how my gun feels/shoots. I can pick up my gun and tell you if it has 1, 2, or zero shells in it — and if it has one, I can tell you with about 70% accuracy if it’s in the top or bottom barrel. So there are some things that I am going to be able to notice while shooting it that many other shooters will not be able to, but that’s because it’s my job to know and understand that stuff — just as you would trust your doctor with his medical background.

Scotland -Poverty and income inequality increasing

Scotland -Poverty and income inequality increasing

Over the four-year period 2013-2017, eleven percent of people in Scotland were in persistent poverty after housing costs. The combined low income and material deprivation rate for children as well as persistent child poverty both fluctuated in recent years and showed no clear trend. Of those children in relative poverty, almost two thirds (65 percent) were living in a household where at least one adult was in paid employment.

This shows a slight increase compared to 2014-17 (19 percent, 1 million people). over the four-year period 2013-2017, eleven percent of people in Scotland were in persistent poverty after housing costs. This compares to 10 percent in 2012-2016. Trends in child poverty are more complex to assess. The latest estimates suggest a slow increase in relative child poverty, whereas absolute poverty remained stable.

The combined low income and material deprivation rate for children as well as persistent child poverty both fluctuated in recent years and showed no clear trend. In 2015-18, 24 percent of children in Scotland, 240,000 children each year, were living in relative poverty after housing costs, the same proportion but a larger number than in the previous period (24 percent, 230,000 children). Of those children in relative poverty, almost two thirds (65 percent) were living in a household where at least one adult was in paid employment.

This proportion had previously shown a steep rising trend since 2007-10 which slowed in 2015-18. Single-year estimates of child poverty are required for reporting as part of the Child Poverty Act. These all show an increase in child poverty compared to last year’s single-year estimates. This confirms the rising trend in relative child poverty. Absolute child poverty appears to be fairly stable, while further data will be required to clarify any longer term trends in persistent child poverty and children in combined low income and material deprivation. pensioner poverty and pensioner material deprivation present a mixed picture as well.

Cultural Relativism: 4 Arguments For & Against Applied Sentience

Cultural Relativism: 4 Arguments For & Against Applied Sentience

But I just cannot see how any of those conclusions can lead to, or even can co-exist with, Cultural Relativism. Why might one be a cultural Relativist? Below I bring up common arguments for Cultural Relativism and then provide counter-arguments.

One So many cultures disagree about so many different things. If the world is full of anything it is passionate disagreement. And because of this it’s easy to wonder if there is any truth behind our moral claims. And since everyone seems to be honest when they make these claims, it seems arrogant to presume that any out of the multitude of nearly identical shouting voices is THE right one.

However, the fact that disagreement exists says absolutely nothing about whether or not there is any truth behind the matter, whether or not one voice among the multitude is closer to the truth. For instance, people disagree about the causes of cancer – does that mean cancer has no cause? All that the existence of widespread, honest and heartfelt disagreement tells us is that this shit is really hard to figure out. Nothing more. Further, there is more agreement that disagreement. Like so much in all of the other sciences, though the disagreements we have about morality are salient, we have a vast resource of agreements behind us.

And again like in the sciences, crazy opinions always lurk around somewhere, but people across the board are social animals who place enormous value in giving respect to those who’ve earned it; love among spouses, children, family and friends; in keeping one’s promises; in protecting the innocent, and so on. two Without God, all is permitted. All laws need a legislator.

So if there is no one up there making the rules, then there are no rules. The presence of ‘moral rules’ is nothing more than what the powerful in each culture have declared or what people, for whatever reason, have simply made up. I’ve never found this argument to make any sense. First, you have the Euthyphro Dilemma. I won’t go into the details, mostly because I’ve already written a post on this. But, basically, either God has reasons for making the moral rules He does, like human legislators in the analogy, or He doesn’t and makes them up arbitrarily.

If they are arbitrary, then that doesn’t explain the force behind their value. We don’t think it right to keep promises because some deity willy-nilly decided that would be ‘right’. If God had reasons, on the other hand, for commanding this or that, then it is those reasons and not God, or any kind of other legislator, that supports morality. Looking back at the shortlist of moral values I list above, we can see what kind of things those ‘reasons’ are. Harm, freedom, love, respect, suffering, reputation, and so on are important in and of themselves.

IT is, for example, the intrinsic value of friendship that supports the virtues that surround it – like trust and compassion – and not that some arbitrary legislator happens to declare friendship to be ‘good’. For a bit more detail, I wrote a long post here on the grounding of ethics without God. Three It’s important to be tolerant of others’ beliefs. If you claim morality is absolute then you are being intolerant of other people’s beliefs. This leads to imperialism, conflict and maybe even worse: genocide. But this argument rests on absolute moral claims themselves! Cultural relativism would certainly say that the person from a tolerant culture ought to be tolerant. But it would also say that a person from an intolerant culture ought to be intolerant.

Science, Technology, and the Future of Warfare – Modern War

Science, Technology, and the Future of Warfare – Modern War

Currently variables and metrics are neither well-characterized nor well-quantified, particularly for specific-defense related concepts. Conceptually, technologies can be seen as evolutionarily advancing current capabilities or those pressing to the ‘bleeding edge’ that enable disruptive, revolutionary capabilities developments.

The ability to differentiate or gain insight into such has thus far not been explored or analyzed robustly with respect to strategic implications beyond a technologically-deterministic lens. The novel scientific principles that underlie the character of these uncertain technologies and their convergence with political and social institutions reveal conceptual and empirical confusion associated with assessing the national security implications.

There also is palpable confusion over the technical and strategic distinguishability and dominance of prospective offensive and defensive systems. The widespread enthusiasm for emerging technologies is reflected not only in official rhetoric but is also codified in respective national technology strategies and the global upswing of dedicated funding.

Military-related programs in potential peer competitors in Asia (China), in states posing regional security challenges in the Middle East (Iran), in the former Soviet Union (Russia), and in rapidly developing areas (including South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Brazil) offer comparisons for advanced, allied states (U.S., western Europe, Japan, ROK) in order to understand the national meanings, organization, and strategic implications surrounding the development and fielding of emerging technology.

As one example of the rhetoric: During a visit to the Kurchatov Institute, Russian President Vladimir Putin commented “This [nanotechnology] could be the key to developing new, modern, and super-effective military systems.²” He later warned of “[a] new round of the arms race is developing in the world,” while calling for the development of Russian science, including nanotechnology, which could be used to develop new types of weapons.

Some states, such as China and those in the Middle East, that have devised new technology strategies are experiencing profound economic and societal transitions. But they differ with respect to critical socio-political and economic criteria for national prosperity and competitiveness (e.g., demography, research and development [R&D] infrastructure and sustainment, and resource endowments versus dependence). Claims for the potential impacts of technology can seem fantastic; at times, differentiating rhetoric from reality can be difficult.

Of critical importance in considering the national and international security implications of technology is that anticipated scenarios should be plausible within constraints of physical viability as well as likely within institutional capacities and tacit capabilities. The extent to which these emerging technologies may exacerbate or mitigate the defense challenges that states will pose in the future to US and regional interests needs to be examined.

How, when, where, and in what form the shifting nature of technological progress may bring enhanced or entirely new capabilities, many of which are no longer the exclusive domain of the link_up States, is contested and requires better analytical tools to enable U.S. assessment, preparation, and response.

To better enable new capabilities and to defend the nation against emerging threats in a new security environment, the role of emerging sciences and technology for US defense and foreign policy should be analytically assessed, theoretically-developed, and understood, i.e., how emerging technologies reconcile with or challenge traditional models for national security, e.g., deterrence, offense-defense balance, strategic security, regime theory, and nonproliferation.

The penultimate goal should not be to predict specific new technologies, which is rarely a high-fidelity pursuit except in retrospective cherry-picking of scenarios from favorite science-fiction stories, and one should be skeptical of any one or group that claims thy can do such.

The aim should be to develop implementable and executable analytical frameworks to explain variable approaches to the development of strategically significant emerging S&T programs, to understand the impact of emerging technology on security in the 21st Century, to enable mechanisms for the world to govern the implications of its own ingenuity, and to inform U.S. defense and foreign policies.

In thinking about the future of warfare, one often encounters two ideological camps: those who prioritize the role of technology and those who don’t. One must always be cognizant and skeptical of slipping into a technological deterministic mindset. That is the notion that technology alone, or is even the most important factor, can determine the outbreak or outcome of conflict.

The wars of the last decade should also remind us that co-option of broadly available commercial technologies may present the most significant operational threat, e.g., cell-phone activated IEDs in Iraq and Afghanistan. At the same time, to deny or dismiss the role of technology in effecting the outcome (as well as outbreak) of war and conflict is also perilous. Neither purist ideology is manifested in the operational world.

Contemporary analyses often expose the tenuous links or disconnections among mainstream scholarship on international security and war (or strategic) studies, understanding of the defense technological innovation and acquisition processes, and fundamental understanding of the underlying science. critically and frequently lacking – in comparative social science and humanities & historically-based studies of emerging technologies – is robust technical security studies, including consideration of the role of tacit knowledge and skills that are not readily quantifiable as part of distinguishing the rhetoric of new technologies from the reality.

Critically and frequently lacking – in comparative technical or engineering-based studies of emerging technologies –are consideration of political, historical, institutional, organizational, economic, and social factors. There is a need to think strategically beyond current challenges. In the late twentieth and early twenty-first century, the nation has struggled – and continues to do so – to deal with the proliferation challenges of new technologically-enabled weapons.

Anticipating the types of threats that may emerge as science and technology advance, the potential consequences of those threats, and the probability that new and more disperse types of enemies will obtain or pursue them is necessary. The potential synergies between biotechnology and other emerging technologies, like additive manufacturing and the cognitive neurosciences, not only suggest tremendous potential for advancement in technology for military applications but also raise new concerns.

When asked what are the current approaches and thinking on means for deterring emerging technologies of concern (beyond cyber) to the U.S., then-USSTRATCOM Commander General Robert Kehler (USAF) responded that “surprise is what keeps me up at night” and cited current uncertainty in how to assess and address emerging and disruptive technologies. In the global information age, the most technologically advanced military power no longer guarantees national security.

Globalization and the information revolution, including the Internet and other communication leaps – have led to much greater visibility into the availability and potential for science and technology. science is and will continue to enable new technological developments becoming accessible and affordable to a larger number of nations and within the grasp of non-state actors: advanced technology is no longer the domain of the few.

Understanding these changing paradigms and the implications for modern warfare starts with an awareness of the factors driving the capabilities, understanding the underlying science and the challenges of foreign policy, considering the changing nature of technological progress and the changing nature of conflict, and the relationship between science and security domestically and internationally.

The importance of bridging the technical and the human domain is increasing; the challenges are organizational, strategic, and enabling the right people to implement and execute it. ¹General Robert Cone, Commander US Army TRADOC, from Mike Morones, “Interview with GEN Robert Cone,” Defense News, 16 December 2013. ²Reuters , “Putin Promotes Nanotechnology in Russia,” 18 April 2007. Dr. Margaret E. Kosal is Associate Professor in the Sam Nunn School of International Affairs at Georgia Institute of Technology and Director of the Sam Nunn Security Program (SNSP). Her research explores the relationships among technology, strategy, and governance.

Details to Know: Top Facts About Swedish Poverty Exploding

Details to Know: Top Facts About Swedish Poverty Exploding

Did you think poverty didn’t exist in Sweden? You thought wrong!

The Swedish welfare system need to be systematically updated in order to best suit the needs of its citizens at this time. In Sweden, all citizens aren’t entitled to generalized healthcare, or mental health care anymore and the prices is exploding, as in “Hedda Care” where just an appointment cost $250 — the price tag on our lives, a game changer for those living in poverty around the world, they’ll die now for sure! Since the job situation is panicking and Swedish Social Services are ignoring up to 80% of the poor, free and equal education to all children, individuals in Sweden don’t matter. If people can not survive nor have anywhere to live, a good book don’t make a difference! The country’s economy has not been this problematic since 1948!

Is poverty being swept under the rug? Some may say yes, simply due to the fact that oftentimes people view countries such as Sweden as being completely without poverty. While poverty may not be as extreme in Sweden (but rising in an extreme speed) — and what is deemed poverty in one location may not be equal to that in another — those living below the poverty line in Sweden and in every country are dealing with limited access to basic human rights such as education, healthcare and adequate living conditions. Housing availability, prices and processes in Sweden affect more than a million people today and those at risk for living in below the poverty line.

While Sweden is considered a welfare state, its housing system functions in a way separate from that of their social security. Perhaps because of their increasing poverty and unemployment levels.

Sweden have higher requirements for low- and middle-income housing that one finds in many places throughout the United States. In Sweden, one needs references, steady work and a high level of disposable income, as well as the ability to find housing yourself, particularly in the current housing crisis. Sweden’s welfare system has become a part of the burden with increasing corruption but has been a way before of controlling the threat of poverty throughout the country.

Killing Rumors about Sweden: The welfare system have NEVER provided a standard minimum income as have been told, we have no free education, no free childcare and no universal free healthcare. To pay for the decreasing welfare, people pay up to 60% of their salery in tax! Each Swede pay $5000 yearly for health care but we don’t get it!

Sweden’s government wanted to provide opportunities for its citizens until ten years ago, to increase their productivity and educated workforce. Sweden’s welfare system also has more negative aspects, one being the forever increasing taxes. Additionally, it is thought that with new problems arising in this era, new conversations occurring on a variety of topics, the Swedish welfare system may need to be systematically updated in order to best suit the needs of its citizens at this time.

Sweden’s aid programs go towards more than generalized programs. In recent years, Sweden has been focused on increasing the number of programs within the reach of government spending that target inequality. Gender inequality has become an important topic in today’s global conversations, specifically when concerning poverty. The inclusion of women in education, healthcare and government are found to have strong positive effects on the alleviation of poverty worldwide, and — on the opposite side of the problem — the effects of poverty on women’s education.

Health and autonomy are very real and are proven to have lasting effects on individuals, the community and the economy. Universal healthcare has the ability to reduce poverty. It has been found that those with access to affordable, effective healthcare possess reduced poverty levels. Education — specifically equal education across gender and socioeconomic status — could be a powerful tool in Sweden’s ability to fight poverty but since the increasing unemployment rates and decreasing amount of business and industries, education do very little. Access to education is often cited as a main reason for poverty and extreme poverty’s persistance across the globe, but it is not entirly true if there are no where to work.

By providing a minimum wage to unemployed people they would survive until the industries come back, equal education to all children must also work together with housing, health and food on their tables. Individuals in Sweden and the country’s economy both benefit from a high level of preparedness to join any workforce that might come in the future. Education, healthcare and welfare are simply tools for the country of Sweden to use in order to combat poverty.

ChristineCleopatra

Camping in Sweden: The Ultimate Guide – Routes North

Camping in Sweden: The Ultimate Guide – Routes North

The law says you have a limited right to cross another person’s land or stay on it for a short period of time, even if the owner hasn’t given specific consent. The same rules apply for cycling and skiing as for walking – avoid crops and areas near buildings and you won’t go far wrong. If you’re at sea or on one of the big lakes (Hjälmaren, Mälaren, Vänern, Vättern or Storsjön) you’re free to fish and eat what you like, as long as you catch it with a rod or small net – leave the trawler at home.

That includes wild plants, any animals you encounter, and any other people who are also out trying to enjoy the Swedish countryside. Don’t walk over or camp on crops, or any other areas that can be easily damaged. Don’t litter. The law says you have a limited right to cross another person’s land or stay on it for a short period of time, even if the owner hasn’t given specific consent. But you cannot pitch up anywhere near their buildings, or otherwise disturb the owner or their business interests. Gardens and other areas that look like they are part of a plot of land around a building are always off limits, even if forested.

You must obey any specific bans on camping, campfires etc. These might apply in areas where rare species are found, or where there’s a big chance of forest fires. If there’s a maximum stay of one night, make sure you only stay for one night. There’s no problem with camping for a night or two in forested areas, so long as you are far enough away from any houses.

Don’t stay for so long that people think you’re squatting and might never leave. What about cycling and skiing? The same rules apply for cycling and skiing as for walking – avoid crops and areas near buildings and you won’t go far wrong. Obviously you should take care not to ski or go cycling if there are signs forbidding it. There’s more info in our guides to skiing and cycling in Sweden.

Can I bring a car or motorbike? The basic rule is that you can only bring your car or motorbike to the point where marked roads ends. If a track is fenced off, don’t try to go along it. Snowmobiles are often permitted in rural areas, but you should always try to stick to marked trails. Can I swim in lakes? Yes, as long as you respect the rules about not getting too near to private homes. If you have a boat or kayak, you can usually take that onto the lake without any trouble (motorboats are sometimes banned for environmental reasons).

Likewise, when lakes freeze over, you’re free to ice-skate or ski across them, providing it’s safe to do so. Into the wildIs it okay to jump from someone else’s jetty? Yes, as long as the owner isn’t using it. If there are slides or more elaborate platforms overhanging the water then they may be able to charge you, but in reality it’s unlikely that they will.

Can I go fishing and eat what I catch? If you’re at sea or on one of the big lakes (Hjälmaren, Mälaren, Vänern, Vättern or Storsjön) you’re free to fish and eat what you like, as long as you catch it with a rod or small net – leave the trawler at home. On smaller lakes and waterways, you’ll almost always need a permit. Can I go foraging? With some exceptions (like saplings, for example) you’re free to pick what you find in the forest.

This means that you can liven up a camping trip with some delicious wild berries, herbs and mushrooms. Be certain that what you’ve picked is safe to eat – you really don’t want to poison yourself a long way from the nearest hospital. Can I pick wild flowers in Sweden? Yes, but do not pull up saplings or remove bark from trees for your campfire. Can I make a campfire? Unless there is a specific rule against it in the area you are camping, yes. Make sure you keep an eye on the fire so that it doesn’t spread – fines for starting fires that get out of control can be hefty. Take extra care in the summertime when things dry out and the risk for forest fires becomes serious.

How Trump Clinches Re-Election

How Trump Clinches Re-Election

It looks like he will be reelected the way the current flows right now, and much more importantly, independents overwhelmingly oppose impeachment. Among independents (the only voters that really matter at this point — everyone else has made up their mind), 49% oppose impeachment versus 34% who support it. That’s not just a landslide 15-point margin in favor of President Trump. It’s also a 26-point swing in Trump’s direction since the hearings started. That’s what you call a disaster for Democrats. The same Emerson poll found Trump’s job approval up to forty-eight percent. That’s a 5-point jump up since October. Meaning ruff is more popular since the impeachment witch-hunt/hearings began. And don’t forget, Emerson poll results are based on “registered voters,” not the far more friendly-to-Trump “likely voters.” but I’m going to switch gears. Because smart minds understand impeachment is already dead.

Among independents (the only voters that really matter at this point — everyone else has made up their mind), 49% oppose impeachment versus 34% who support it. The same Emerson poll found Trump’s job approval up to forty-eight percent. And don’t forget, Emerson poll results are based on “registered voters,” not the far more friendly-to-Trump “likely voters.” but I’m going to switch gears.
Alien Spotted Boarding UFO in Romania?

Alien Spotted Boarding UFO in Romania?

The most popular iteration of this video was likely the one posted to the Târgoviște+ Facebook page where it garnered more than fifteen million views: Although many expressed skepticism about the footage, some were convinced that this video documented an actual alien making a pit stop in Romania. For one, internet users couldn’t quite agree on where this video supposedly took place. most claimed that the video was shot in Târgoviște, but others shared this video as if showed an incident outside of Bacău, a Romanian city approximately three hundred kilometers to the northeast, while others claimed that the footage showed an alien invasion in Alaska.

Alien Spotted Boarding UFO in Romania?

The most popular iteration of this video was likely the one posted to the Târgoviște+ Facebook page where it garnered more than fifteen million views: Although many expressed skepticism about the footage, some were convinced that this video documented an actual alien making a pit stop in Romania. This video doesn’t actually show an extraterrestrial being. For one, internet users couldn’t quite agree on where this video supposedly took place. most claimed that the video was shot in Târgoviște, but others shared this video as if showed an incident outside of Bacău, a Romanian city approximately three hundred kilometers to the northeast, while others claimed that the footage showed an alien invasion in Alaska.

918 Dead by Fundamentalism -Brainwash or Human Need?

918 Dead by Fundamentalism -Brainwash or Human Need?

Author: ChristineCleopatra Djerf

Peoples Temple

Sect in Sweden or cult in America

A sect can be described as a group to which you can become a member by fulfilling the wishes of the charismatic leader. It is a summary description of a sect but, far from all. A sect is considered to have, just as a charismatic leader, a leader who can “influence” other people for their own benefit or for the “group” benefit. This also applies to our elected representatives in politics.

I want to develop this.
Within family and politics, we all have a need for faith in those who will lay down our future. We want to be accepted, loved and given tools for the future. We believe in the future that strong bonds can create.

I know that I am very strong mentally. Because of this, I back out of many social situations to leave the individual in a maturity phase where decisions for the future are made by the individual himself. I throw out some anchors here and there and always stand for a parachute. For me, it is very important that the student learns from several sources and that I only point to an alternative path.

In one sect, the leader’s own outstanding ability to influence his surroundings is “exploited” to a desired result. The sect leader is “charismatic” or very strong mentally and manipulative. Religious belief in a sect is of less importance, the sect only exist as long as the leader does. The leader is the driving force.

On November 18, 1978, a total of 918 people died, 909 in JonesTown and of these there were “272” children. To be fair in my presentation of Peoples Temple and Jim Jones, I first want to tell you about the dream, the perfect Christian and socialist society that was behind the ideology.

CNN

In 1955, Jones founded the “Wings of delivierence” church which later became the Temple of the People. In 1966, when Jim was seen as a healing Pastor, his sermons could be laid out like this.
First he talked about injustice, then racism and lastly “healing”. He knew that what attracted was the miracle but to be able to participate in it, the congregation had to listen to social criticism first. At the back of the church there were medical staff and tables set up for free healthcare, for the community’s seniors there were blood pressure gauges and others could be tested for immunity diseases. They also had a well-organized social activity which meant, among other things, to follow their members to hospitals when needed, so one can perceive a significant social commitment.

Until 1978, Jim had been the group’s pastor and as he himself said and others testified to a caring father figure. He had in his intimacy with the group, the group as an extension of his body. He felt that people had no life without him. The members were not only part of his life, he could no longer separate them from himself.

Despite the symbiosis-like intimacy in the group, there was always someone or some who thought this was uncomfortable and deserted with the group’s almost tasteless history to anyone who was willing to listen. The group that had grown into a smaller community in 1978 was hard pressed by the public, authorities and troubled relatives. With JonesTown, society was protected from transparency and the world’s vivid imaginations built disaster images before anything had happened. The press was now not only on Jim Jones but also on the US authorities. What really happened in the jungle?

Because of all the newspaper writings and troubled relatives’ pressure, Congressman Leo Ryan took on the task of investigating what was going on in Jonestown. He was allowed to bring a group of people and journalists with no clear views on the temple sect. What Ryan and the journalists see is happy people dancing and singing and loving life in their small town.

Within the camp or community in Jonestown, they had practiced “white nights” disaster preparedness every other night, held meetings on the safety and future of Jonestown and the survival of the temple sect. In these fairs, collective suicide was also practiced. There were witnesses of armed guards keeping an eye on the fairs, but the weapons were not intended to keep people away during the nights, they were aimed at the group. Thus, there was a clear psychological stress on the members of the community but, which was also justified by themselves. The jumpers could not see the logic of what was happening and could feel the affinity with the group or Jim Jones’ consuming love. Those who were strong fled.

Every time someone fled the community, Jim Jones was very ill at ease, he couldn’t understand how anyone could leave his care and love. After all, he was life itself for society and he was prepared to die for all of them. One of the ones he identifies as a threat to the group and their freedom is the US government.
He repeats during the death speech before the suicide “I would rather hand ourselves in than let them slaughter our children”. In the speech he says that there is no other solution than to lay down their lives for the right to freedom before judgment

Every time someone fled the community, Jim Jones was very ill at ease, he couldn’t understand how anyone could leave his care and love. After all, he was life itself for society and he was prepared to die for all of them. One of the ones he identifies as a threat to the group and their freedom is the US government.
He repeats during the death speech before the suicide “I would rather hand ourselves in than let them slaughter our children”. In the speech, he says that there is no other solution than to give up their lives for the right to freedom before they (the US military on behalf of Ryan) come to kill us.

The recorded tape was just one of the 1000’s of records of Jonestown’s operations. Therefore, not much is left to further speculation

On the tape, he predicts “someone will shoot the pilot it’s not something I’ve ordered, I just know”. Jim is still speaking as a prophet to his members even though he has planned and sent his loyalist to fire the pilot. The aircraft was supposed to crash into the jungle. The group of defectors warns pro-journalists of the loyalist’s suspicious mission. It doesn’t go as well as Jim planned and after the Loyalist injured two people, he was overpowered. So Jim has decided in the same vein as Leo Ryan and the others leave Jonestown that now the total tragedy will happen and it should lie on the government’s shoulders. It was a revolutionary suicide.

Jones’s message from the beginning was a Christian community based on love for his neighbor without segregation of color, relationship or status. He turned to vulnerable individuals and offered food with his mushroom kitchen, housing for homeless and free healthcare. During his time in San Francisco, he had over 2,000 members. The dream was Jonestown, the burgeoning socialist paradise.

Something Jim doesn’t do, picking up during the band’s run is the truck with Jones’ followers arriving at the airport and executing, among other things, Leo Ryan before getting on the bigger plane.

I get the feeling through everything I read that Jim Jones had tired of his work, his son claims that Jim was affected by drugs, labile and tired of life over the law. As he had grown up with his congregation, he could not only pack up and go, there were an incredible amount of people he controlled life for and maybe one should keep in mind when one is judging. How easy is it for a parent to control just one child? Every day, year in and year out, Jim Jones was the father of around 1,000 “children” in his ward. He experienced outside threats to their utopia that were both real and distorted conspiracy theories. It was time to end it all now.

I have to say that the “death band” is one of its kind where the listener knows that the man who speaks leads nearly a thousand people into death as soon as the tape ends. Somewhere I would like to interrupt the divisive and absent-minded thinking but, when this happened, I was 8 years old. He gently urges parents to “lay down your childrens lives” so they don’t get slaughtered later. I am appalled and fascinated by the number of people who so willingly give up their lives and that there seems to be only one woman trying to find a way out through the discussion.

You probably don’t know what a charismatic leader is until you read about Jim Jones.

18+ Everything you need to know about Champions League Final

18+ Everything you need to know about Champions League Final

Beside hinting you the best links ever, we’re thrilled to be giving away a major deal-breaking-bonus to our Swedish players! The ticket is yours!

More about the bonus ticket in the bottom of the page!
  1. Hit the brakes and read the latest news on Skysports:

https://www.skysports.com/champions-league-news?fbclid=IwAR14fqurqyaJAwnaZlE6W-e6H26zzAOljhaahmSp0hmt0zQz52TDiC4m-dg

2. Find the latest scores on UEFA Champions League scoreboard:

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=champions+league+final+2019#sie=lg;/g/11f6gj7kgn;2;/m/0c1q0;mt;fp;1;;

3. Read it on UEFA:

https://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/stories/

4. Watch it on:

https://www.uefa.com/tvguide/?iv=true#!/?date=2019-11-26#todaymatches

ÅRETS ODDSBOOST! Satsa 200kr, VINN 4000KR CASH!

Champions League går in i avgörande omgång tisdag och onsdag.

Kommer favoriterna klara sig vidare från gruppen eller vi får skrällar de sista omgångarna.

William Hill har plockat fram en SUPERBOOST på favoriterna.
Istället för 5.40 i odds så ger de hela 20.00 i en oddstrippel.
Satsar du 200kr så vinner du 4000kr i cash.

Liverpool, Juventus och Barcelona, klarar de favorittrycket?

Klicka här för att ta BOOSTEN: https://kortalankar.se/Z6na

✅

Spela på vinst för Liverpool, Juve & Barca i CL!

✅

FÅ 20.00 i ODDS istället för 5.40!

✅

Satsa 200kr, vinn 4000kr OMSÄTTNINGSFRITT!

Minsta insättning för oddsboost 500kr!

| 18+ | Regler och villkor gäller | www.stodlinjen.se |